News
February 10, 2008
Backlog hounds State Police lab

Evidence sits in a secured room at West Virginia State Police headquarters in South Charleston, waiting to be examined for law enforcement agencies from all over the state.

There are guns that need to be inspected, drug samples that need to be analyzed and DNA evidence that needs to be tested.

If a crime is committed tomorrow and evidence goes to the State Police Crime Lab soon after, investigators can expect a long wait on results.

1 of 2 Photos
Lawrence Pierce
Chemist Carrie Kirkpatrick examines evidence at the lab. Since July 2002, 14 civilian analysts have quit, requiring recruits to be trained each time, officials say.
To examine most of the evidence now at the lab would take about three years, said Soraya McClung, director of the lab.

"Currently there are about 650 cases where there could be DNA evidence that needs tests performed," said Lt. H.B. Myers, supervisor of the lab's biochemistry section. "I often send out lists of cases to agencies to see which are active and need a response. We work cases to priorities."

The reason for the backlog is the high rate of turnover among the lab's scientists because of better-paying jobs elsewhere, McClung said.

The state Department of Homeland Security is asking the state Legislature for about $250,000 to increase pay for the lab's civilian employees in hopes of retaining them, said State Police Col. David L. Lemmon.

An additional $110,000 is needed to hire three more employees in the lab, McClung said.

"The backlog of cases is something that really shouldn't go on," Lemmon said. "Unfortunately we are in a situation where we have a lot more evidence coming in than we have the ability to process."

Two cases have recently brought attention to the backlog at the crime lab.

Huntington police have repeatedly said they were waiting for results from the lab in the case of college student Leah Hickman, whose body was found in the basement of her apartment in December.

Police have been kept up to date on test results in the Hickman case as the tests have been run, Myers said.

"My part of the work is completed," he said. "I don't have a report. It's a long process. ... My guess is, when they have the report on their desk, they are not going to release much information. The more they release, the more information is passed along to potential suspects."

In January, the trial of Fayette County resident Victor Martin had to be postponed because the lab hadn't tested the alleged murder weapon. Martin, 56, is charged with the shooting deaths of three men found on the road in front of his property in Hico.

The firearm could have been examined in time for the original trial date had the lab been properly informed, said Lt. R.K. Taylor, quality manager for the lab.

Prosecutors in the case called the crime lab on a Friday and asked that the evidence be expedited, then the following week informed the judge in the case that the lab didn't have the evidence examined, Taylor said.

"We can't do it in a day," Taylor said. "Yes we have a backlog, but if prosecutors follow the steps in place in a timely fashion, we have the ability to get the work done."

It is important in such cases that there is constant communication among investigators, prosecutors and the lab, Myers said.

A pricy job market

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser