December 18, 2009
Voters should give liberals what for
Advertiser

POLITICS is all about "Yes." Yes, we will give you Social Security. Yes, we will give you Medicare.

Yes, we will help more Americans buy homes.

Now it's yes, we will give everybody health insurance - charity care being demeaning.

And yes, we will close the "doughnut hole" in the Medicare drug benefit.

Politically, this works. American politicians have taxed and taxed, spent and spent, and been elected and elected for decades on the basis of such generosity.

It dawns on some voters only slowly that politicians don't have any money.

What they "give" people, Americans pay for - directly through personal taxes, or indirectly in a higher price for stuff made more costly by what politicians call "taxes on business."

Businesses don't have any money either; they get theirs from consumers. 

But finally, the costs of this cynical political game are evident.

The "we" in politicians' promises is us. And we're tapped out.

The Medicare "trust fund" will go broke in 2017, and the Social Security "trust fund" by 2037. Punishing taxes and benefit cuts are inevitable.

But the majority party in Washington seems unable to grasp, or perhaps to accept, that the jig is up.

Members of the U.S. Senate just passed a $447 billion spending bill that raises federal agencies' expenditures by $48 billion - up 12 percent from this fiscal year.

It's full of "gifts" - about 5,000 "earmarks" worth nearly $3.9 billion - that are now raining down on members' districts.

As the Wall Street Journal put it, "That increase - when inflation is negligible - is in addition to the $311 billion in stimulus already authorized or out the door for these programs.

"Adding this new stash means that federal agencies will have received a nearly 70 percent increase in the last two years."

This after federal policies helped cause a housing bust, which helped cause a bank meltdown, which caused the American economy to pancake into recession.

Americans have lost $12 trillion in household net worth.

And what the Democratic majority in Congress proposes to spend is all borrowed money.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: mtnmedic (5:35pm 12-18-2009)
Report Abuse


Very well said, I'm just shocked the Gazette would print it.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Tiki Monkey Tattoo and Piercing
Montgomery's First Tattoo Parlor!
Advertisement - Your ad here