December 7, 2009
Margaret Chapman Pomponio: Women's health is not a game
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- I work for a reproductive justice organization. That means that for almost 10 years, I've been advocating for West Virginia families to improve education on reproductive decisions, increase access to affordable birth control, and protect personal decision-making, including decisions about whether or when to have a child. This means that we at WV FREE support access to abortion care because it's what women sometimes need as part of their basic health care.

We want health reform legislation to succeed. We support and applaud efforts of our allies and policymakers in making tremendous strides toward a comprehensive health plan that will help millions of people across this country and in our state get the care they need.

So I am disappointed that the badly needed legislation to expand health-care coverage has turned a woman's health care into what seems like a game of political football.

We may not all feel the same way about abortion, but the debate over health reform shouldn't become a forum to take away a woman's decision-making. Anti-choice politicians in Washington have once again resorted to interference in a woman's most personal, private medical decisions. Our opponents didn't have the votes to ban abortion completely, so instead they are penalizing women financially.

Though we are strongly opposed to it, our health-care system already prohibits federal funding of insurance coverage of abortion through the Hyde Amendment, a severely restrictive law that has been in effect for more than three decades. A recent amendment to the U.S. House of Representatives health reform bill, known as the Stupak Amendment, threatens to go much further by taking away private health insurance benefits that women currently have by placing unprecedented restrictions on a woman's ability to purchase private health insurance coverage for abortion.

Women should not be punished because we are reproductive creatures. No woman should be left with insurance that doesn't cover the full spectrum of reproductive health care. Whether she is facing an unintended pregnancy or a fetal anomaly in a very wanted pregnancy -- women have abortions for many different reasons, and each person's circumstance is different. No woman should have to delay an abortion because she can't afford it. No woman should face financial ruin because our insurance system has turned its back on her reproductive health needs. 

Health-care reform should help a woman keep coverage she already has. Let's stick to our vision for health reform that expands access to health care and includes a woman's reproductive health care. Let's work in partnership and remain firm in our commitment that if a woman gets pregnant, she has the ability to make the best decision for herself and her family. 

Pomponio is executive director of WV FREE, the state's leading reproductive justice organization.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: chucker (4:17pm 12-11-2009)
Report Abuse


Basic health care for women = Pap smears and mammograms.
Abortion will never be considered basic health care.
Nearly half of all abortions are obtained by women who have already had at least one abortion. Health care right? NO. Convenience.

Posted By: kittykat (10:38am 12-11-2009)
Report Abuse


If you can't afford an abortion, you sure as he*&ll can't afford a kid. I personally have no problem with tax payer funded abortions. But I understand why "pro-life" supporters don't want to pay for abortions. That's the difference between me and my more militant counterparts. I am also deeply disturbed by late second and third trimester abortions. I don't think the right to terminate a pregnancy is absolute. But express these views among militant pro-choice supporters and you will be accused of being a closet Sarah Palin fan.

There's no middle ground with extreme reproductive rights organizations and that is why abortion rights have declined steadily for 20 years and will continue to do so. Although there is no eminent threat to the right of choice, abortion opposition has lead to diminished reproductive rights services and will continue to do so. Pro-choice advocates blame anti-choice but it's really their refusal to consider anything less than unrestrained abortion on demand.

Posted By: ioanthe (6:54am 12-11-2009)
Report Abuse


Statistics say that up to 93% of all abortions performed in the US are done so because the woman does not want to be pregnant..NOT because of rape, incest or danger for the mother or child's life

...liars, damned liars and statisticians... as the joke goes.

A rape happens in this country every seven minutes.

What will you do, set up courts to decide who was raped and who is just loose? How about the girl that gets pregnant because of a broken condom or because of a drug interaction with the pill.

If only one abortion per year was performed because of rape or incest, it should be legal.

If abortion is covered under healthcare insurance, then why not breast implants, nose jobs and other elective surgeries?

Viagre is covered under most plans... 'nuff said.

Posted By: chucker (4:48pm 12-10-2009)
Report Abuse


Abortion is not about healthcare. Abortion is an elective surgery. Statistics say that up to 93% of all abortions performed in the US are done so because the woman does not want to be pregnant..NOT because of rape, incest or danger for the mother or child's life. It is a surgery of convenience. If abortion is covered under healthcare insurance, then why not breast implants, nose jobs and other elective surgeries? Visit our local clinic that provides abortion and you will see many repeat offenders. Women who did NOT take advantage of available birth control or other healthy options. There is nothing fanatical about not wanting to kill unborn children. It is about protecting and speaking up for those who can't speak up for themselves.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here