September 25, 2008
Broadcasters debate excludes Mountain Party
Advertiser

Denied an invitation to the Oct. 13 West Virginia Broadcasters Association debate, one gubernatorial candidate said he hopes to use the courts - or the court of public opinion - to crash the party.

"Not being represented in what is supposed to be a fair and unbiased debate, that's just a travesty of justice," Mountain Party candidate Jesse Johnson said Wednesday of the snub.

Johnson, a Charleston actor and director who first ran for governor in 2004, also was barred from participating in the association's gubernatorial debate that October. He failed in his last-minute attempt to get a court injunction ordering that he be included in that debate.

Johnson said he's again weighing that option. "I will use everything at my disposal, which certainly includes the court system," he said.

Johnson said he first hopes to use public opinion to convince the association to rethink its decision, including having supporters pressure individual TV stations that will be airing the debate.

"When one political party is being excluded from the public airwaves that belong to us all, that is unfair," he said.

Michele Crist, director of the WVBA, said the association's long-standing policy has been to invite only the two major-party candidates to participate in the fall gubernatorial debates.

"The West Virginia Broadcasters Association has done that since we started doing these debates some 20 years ago," she said.

Crist said that, excluding commercials, the broadcast runs only 48 minutes - which she said is not enough time to have a meaningful debate featuring third-party and independent candidates.

"Dividing that time among even two candidates, to get good, lengthy answers on issues, you're already running short on time," she said.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Anonymous (3:02pm 09-27-2008)
Report Abuse


England's Parliament had a two party system too, the Whigs and the Tories, which did not suit the pleas for justice of the oppressed American colonists.

Just because there are two parties in West Virginia does not mean that one is better than the other, or that they will be on your side, or listen to your pleas for change. It has always been this way.

Posted By: Anonymous (3:09pm 09-26-2008)
Report Abuse


Wow, only the major party candidates. Try being fair. of course, the whole that's the way we've always done it argument is a beautiful excuse. We don't want change. We want the status quo. Yep, that's the state of West Virginia. We want to stay the same as it was in 1865.

Posted By: Anonymous (3:40pm 09-25-2008)
Report Abuse


I wonder if the Gazette and its affiliate newspapers know that discrimination is against the law. If they cannot give equal time to all the gubernatorial candidates, then they should not give any time. These other gubernatorial candidates should sue the pants off these partisan newspapers. Go to Project Vote Smart, they have a dot org address and read about the other gubernatorial candidates and then vote for one of them and show the newspaper that we are not as stupid as they think we are. Just remember that you had to read the New York Times to learn what underhanded schemes Joe Manchin has been up to while in office. Now you should read Project Vote Smart to learn about the other candidates.

Posted By: Anonymous (12:19am 09-25-2008)
Report Abuse


I would rather listen to all views in order to make an informed choice this Novemeber than to be led by the nose and vote Party lines. It's much like being offered coffee and tea when what I really need is clean water.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
GORDON, ELIAS & SEELY, L.L.P.
At Gordon & Elias L.L.P., we provide advocacy for West Virginia residents suffering serious a...
Advertisement - Your ad here