News
August 8, 2008
Medicaid change failing children in state, report says
Advertisement - Your ad here

West Virginia's redesigned Medicaid health insurance program is failing the state's poorest children, according to a report released Thursday.

More than 90 percent of West Virginia children with Medicaid - including newborns - have had their health benefits restricted since the program changed two years ago, the study found.

"Children are losing benefits under this punitive policy change," said Joan Alker, deputy executive director of the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families in Washington, D.C. "Clearly, the children who are most negatively impacted are children who have the most serious health care needs."

The report declared West Virginia's revamped Medicaid program "seriously flawed" and "not working as currently structured."

Alker said there's widespread confusion among families and doctors about the changes.

"This policy has been so poorly implemented that families and physicians don't understand it," Alker said. "Understanding is critical, if you're trying to change health behaviors."

State Medicaid officials refuted the report's findings Thursday, calling them a rehash of previous unwarranted criticism.

"We are terribly disappointed in Georgetown University," said Shannon Landrum, a Medicaid spokeswoman. "The information in the report is a rehash of old discussions and misconceptions. Children are receiving all medically necessary services."

Only a small percentage - about 8 percent - of parents with children on Medicaid statewide have signed "personal responsibility" agreements to improve their kids' health in exchange for expanded benefits - the cornerstone of the state's new plan.

That leaves an overwhelming majority of children with a stripped down "basic" package that has fewer benefits than traditional Medicaid.

The Georgetown study found that children comprise 85 percent of those affected by the Medicaid changes.

"Children can't sign the agreements themselves," Alker said. "If you're trying to change behaviors, why is this program targeting children?"

The basic plan limits children to four prescriptions a month. Mental health services also are restricted.

"Improving health and promoting healthy behaviors are laudable goals, but restricting health-care coverage for infants and children is not the way to achieve them," Alker said.

Why are so few parents signing up their children for enhanced benefits? Alker said the state bungled the program's implementation. 

Advertisement - Your ad here
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Winky (11:34pm 08-13-2008)
Report Abuse


I'll say it again in case you missed it the first time.....

ME DI CIDE. Population control in disguise of " better money management" in disguise as " better health choices " in disguise as " a responsible accountable director over seeing the funds of a billion dollar state tab".

You still don't get it do ya.....THEY DONT GIVE A CRAP ABOUT KIDS OR FAMILIES SUFFERING...THEY CARE ABOUT THE MONEY.
Questions? Call DHHR and complain or get better yet....get to a voting booth and get that jackass out of office.

Posted By: A Advocate (4:32pm 08-11-2008)
Report Abuse


Usually, when a good plan goes awry, corrective measures are taken. When so many people are ending up in default "basic" status, nobody's "plans" or "dreams" are being realized. Health remains poor, people don't get needed health care, everyone is confused. It's kinda like the recent backup backup on the Turnpike - and it's time the Govenor steps in and demands a better approach to a good idea.

Posted By: redesign failure (3:21pm 08-11-2008)
Report Abuse


The Medicaid "Redesign" Mountain Health Choices initial plans began with good intentions, then failed miserably. The entire program should be suspended until the kinks are worked out. DHHR is obviously in denial. They refuse to believe that MHC isnt meeting the needs of families. By the way a comment for Joe6pk (who is obviously in denial as well) if your healthcare provider made you sign a agreement not to use emergency rooms unless it was a emergency with the consequences of losing your healthcare if you did would you sign it? Especially when the insurance company defines emergencies AFTER your visit?? And Govornor Manchin when will you step up to the plate and admit to a mistake? Families on Medicaid in WV vote Govornor.

Posted By: Concerned Mom (3:46pm 08-09-2008)
Report Abuse


It is not parental responsibility or lack of that is putting us in this Basic plan. It is lack of education by the state that has made many of us end up in Basic without being given a choice. This program was enacted without helping us understand it. The information came out in what looked like junk mail envelopes from Pittsburg. If you opened the envelope you still didn’t really learn anything about the program. If you called your case worker at the welfare department they didn’t have a clue what you were talking about, neither did your doctor if you were lucky enough to have one. If you didn’t have a doctor you had to get one assigned and then try to make an appointment within the allotted time. When you finally made it in to see your assigned doctor, they didn’t know what was going on either or exactly what they were supposed to do with the paperwork. In the mean time while everyone is trying to figure out exactly what they are supposed to do to help you get in Enhanced Medicaid, your time has run o

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertisement - Your ad here