News
June 9, 2008
Judge sues W.Va. Masons

An administrative law judge from Brooke County has filed a lawsuit against the West Virginia branch of the Masons, claiming they wrongly expelled him for trying to make the organization more inclusive.

According to the lawsuit filed May 30 in Kanawha Circuit Court, Charlie L. Montgomery and Charles F. Coleman II, both officers of the Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons of the State of West Virginia Inc., summarily threw Frank Joseph Haas out of the Masons for fabricated reasons.

Montgomery and Coleman are named as defendants in the suit, as is the Grand Lodge and several John Does.

Haas' lawsuit offers a glimpse into the world of the Masons, a centuries-old organization that traces its roots back to the United Kingdom. While the society is not exactly secretive, it has often been veiled in mystery, as some of its customs and practices are not revealed to non-members.

Haas joined the Masonic Lodge in Wellsburg in 1986, four years after he earned his law degree from West Virginia University. After years of dedicated service, Haas became the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge in October 2005, the suit maintains.

As Grand Master, Haas tried to make the organization's policies less discriminatory and racist and more in line with the U.S. Constitution and the state's public policy, the suit contends.

"Haas' goal was to make Masonry more tolerant, friendly, decent and accepting of everyone regardless of nationality, race, religion or disability," the suit states.

In October 2006, members of the Grand Lodge voted to adopt the progressive reforms put forward by Haas, the lawsuit alleges.

"These reforms and proposals were intended to rid Masonry in West Virginia of [its] Orwellian, repressive, regressive and unconstitutional practices," the lawsuit states.

In response, Coleman, who succeeded Haas as Grand Master, "almost immediately unilaterally entered various edicts rendering the progressive proposals voted on and adopted by a majority of Defendant Grand Lodge null and void," the suit claims.

Coleman justified his actions by claiming that the vote was invalid because of procedural errors, the suit alleges. But no Masons were punished for the alleged errors, and no further votes on the reforms have been allowed since, according to Haas.

Over the next year, Haas continued to speak out about the Grand Lodge's ethical, moral and legal obligations to reform its policies, the lawsuit maintains.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close

0 / 150
Posted By: AF&AM (2:14am 07-20-2008)
Report Abuse


Look at this. If the Ancient craft excepts prince hall what would masonry lead to? Next women, athiest, madmen and fools be in the ranks. Rules are rules. Thats why we are ancient. I say no to prince hall. Good job WV.

Posted By: JK Mason (8:30pm 06-17-2008)
Report Abuse


We had a similar case in PA although The Grand Master expelled some of lesser grade than a RWPGM. That lawsuit ended in all of those expelled being readmitted plus other remunerations. Why??? Because the Grand Master did not follow the fraternity's own laws, which require a Mason be charged with unmasonic conduct and be granted a Masonic trial prior to expulsion.

Posted By: Jerry.PM.PHP,VM (6:26pm 06-17-2008)
Report Abuse


Montgomery and Coleman are a disgrase should be brought up on Masonic charges and expelled. Missouri Masons now go to Prince Hall mettings and visa versa. All are welcome to become members.

Posted By: 2Bsued (12:51am 06-15-2008)
Report Abuse


Wow, some day I will get sued for discriminatory practices because I don't invite some people to my 4th of July cookout!

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser